I think you're taking some of my language too literally. I wasn't necessarily claiming that Twitter has some yet to be found soul mate in the form of a perfect

I think you're taking some of my language too literally. I wasn't necessarily claiming that Twitter has some yet to be found soul mate in the form of a perfect owner. I was more suggesting that someone whose behavior has at times seemed erratic and immature might not provide the best leadership for a company like Twitter. Especially since, ostensibly, their business is all about how people present themselves and communicate on the internet. I guess I thought someone might come along with some technical, economic reasons why his individual behavior and choices might not factor in as much as I imagine. Although I guess the way I began the discussion probably invited misinterpretations.