4 ms·
Serious question: how many Twitter employees (engineers + managers + directors + whateveer other levels) will quit/protest/strike if Elon un-suspends Trump's ac
by MuffinFlavored 5y ago
Serious question: how many Twitter employees (engineers + managers + directors + whateveer other levels) will quit/protest/strike if Elon un-suspends Trump's account, and what are the chances Elon suspends Trump's account?
- tick_tock_tick 5y agoSerious response: Wouldn't that be good for Twitter to get rid of those people? It's like when Coinbase offered people a payout if you're not 100% onboard with there mission and told people to stop talking politics.
- parkingrift 5y agoI've no doubt Elon would be happy for these people to quit so that he doesn't have to fire them.
- spoonjim 5y agoIt doesn’t matter how many quit. The asset of Twitter is its network and they won’t be taking it with them.
- lr4444lr 5y agoSemi seriously, I think Musk would use a move like that to conveniently encourage the kind of people he doesn't want at Twitter to self selectively remove themselves rather than go through a painful HR process of finding and identifying them manually.
- downandout 5y agoExactly this. Musk doesn't seem to have any patience for political nonsense - from either side of the political spectrum. The kinds of employees that would do this likely aren't a culture fit in a Musk-run operation, where pragmatism is the order of the day. You can always find another employee who isn't a PIA.
- lostlogin 5y agoYou characterise Musk as pragmatic?
- downandout 5y agoI characterize the organizations he creates as pragmatic. They exist to objectively look at problems and solve them. You cannot solve hard engineering problems in any other way.
- MuffinFlavored 5y agoWhile I don't think you are wrong... I have to wonder what % of the staff at Twitter that is. I'm sure their core application doesn't have a bus factor of 1 but... a mass exodus of staff (5%? 10%? 20%?) could be an interesting problem.
- jack_riminton 5y agoJudging by the quality of the work done and the decisions made (Zuckerberg calls twitter a clown car falling into a gold mine) I don't think their departure would matter too much.
- infamouscow 5y agoSerious answer: nobody cares. Twitter employees can find employment elsewhere if they don't like their new boss. There's no shortage of people that want to work for Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, and Elon's other businesses. Twitter is no different.
- extheat 5y agoI think Twitter could actually financially benefit from lessening their head count. It's not an incredibly profitable company, and could do with changes to leadership and direction in terms of their lagging performance compared to other tech companies.
- jdrc 5y agodont they have too many employees?
- Volrath89 5y agoSerious question: How come he is banned forever? It’s definitely against free speech, I’m with Musk on that one. If he (or any other person) does something against some written/objective rule then sure ban him temporarily. But permabans should be only for posting illegal stuff.
- mewle 5y agoHe used Twitter to foment a violent insurrection.
- Aromasin 5y agoSee their statement on it below. Inciting violence against others is against their ToS, and his comments about marching on the capitol building were interpreted by the team responsible for banning accounts that break ToS (presumably a specialist committee with it being Trump) as a violation: https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/suspension https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/suspensio...
- MuffinFlavored 5y ago> How come he is banned forever? https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/suspension https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/suspensio... > due to the risk of further incitement of violence.
- jumpkick 5y agoNo one but the (US) government needs to give a hoot about free speech, nor should they.
- trixie_ 5y agoIf they have stock options then leaving might be a bad idea if Musk increases the value of the company significantly with his changes.