5 ms·
Yeah, but nothing stops you from serving twitter.com from a CDN on Mars for Mars users, right? They'll even have netflix, if you think about it. Not youtube th
by motoboi 5y ago
Yeah, but nothing stops you from serving twitter.com from a CDN on Mars for Mars users, right?
They'll even have netflix, if you think about it. Not youtube thought.
- munk-a 5y agoUnfortunately they'll only have access to the old style disk Netflix and those envelopes will come with a hell of a postage cost on them. /s More seriously, I don't know why you assume Netflix would be accessible or a priority for settling on Mars - or that Youtube wouldn't be.
- memetomancer 5y agobecause Netflix data is measure in GB / week, while Youtube is measure in TB / second.
- munk-a 5y agoI assume that the primary conveyance of data would just be a hard drive (or other storage method) actually sent to mars with the mission. Just like the bundle of wikipedia you could order on a CD, curate stuff of particularly high quality and send it with the crew. For live transmission I think signal issues will cause everything to need to be pre-buffered basically to completion so streaming is not a realistic thing to consider. For instance, twitch is probably just flat out unless we have some pretty insane developments in general data transmission reliability (probably including FTL data transmission which, who knows, might some day be possible through entanglement).
- motoboi 5y agoNetflix is served from a Netflix openconnect appliance inside your ISP datacenter, not from the cloud. They just send one to Mars and it’s good to go.