4 ms·
I think he means the inverse: for people able to find joy despite adverse circumstances. More importantly, I would say, it's likely innate to us that we are un
by anshorei 4y ago
I think he means the inverse: for people able to find joy despite adverse circumstances.
More importantly, I would say, it's likely innate to us that we are unhappy without adverse circumstances. I.e. for there to be brightness there needs to be darkness.
- oneoff786 4y agoHe claimed it was the primary effect. Which is absurd. And claimed it was easily observed by family inheritance? That’s obviously wrong.