>any scientist name i'll give as a reference will be immediately categorized as "anti-vax" or "fringe and non representative" That's because they probably are

>any scientist name i'll give as a reference will be immediately categorized as "anti-vax" or "fringe and non representative" That's because they probably are fringe and non representative. And for every Galileo there are 100.000 Dr Wakefield's > a lot of the consensus around covid vaccines has been proved incorrect times and times again If that were true it wouldn't be the consensus, by definition.