5 ms·
What are you saying? I studied years of Latin, and have no idea what your sentences means. Literally, “With this, therefore that.” I know it’s a fallacy, but
by pyuser583 5y ago
What are you saying? I studied years of Latin, and have no idea what your sentences means.
Literally, “With this, therefore that.”
I know it’s a fallacy, but fallacies need to be shown, not cited.
- roel_v 5y agoYour translation doesn't include 'propter'. A more accurate translation is 'with this, therefore because of this'. Which is a pretty intuitive description of the fallacy it describes.
- pyuser583 5y agoMy apologies. I was confused “propter” and “propterea.” Mea culpa.
- i5heu 5y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_cau...
- mrtranscendence 5y ago... if you know enough to realize it's referring to a fallacy, then you must surely know what the sentence means.