3 ms·
The license seems straightforward. You can use and distribute software written in Hare, but if you want to link or make changes to the tooling (compiler, etc) y
by staticassertion 4y ago
The license seems straightforward. You can use and distribute software written in Hare, but if you want to link or make changes to the tooling (compiler, etc) you must open source those.
- ninjin 4y agoYes, legally it is perfectly clear. Just not the why. Is there any other language that has taken a similar approach? Has this been discussed in relation to Hare somewhere apart from the brief chunk of text that I linked? I am perfectly accepting that I may be in error here in terms of how I view licensing, but it bothers me that I can not build a mental model of the intentions of the authors.
- sanxiyn 4y agoIt seems basically equivalent to gcc/glibc, which I think is a good default.