4 ms·
Even with it spelled out in your own quote, you can't admit the mistake This is not good faith and I have no interest in arguing with your most recent use of a
by JohnHaugeland 5y ago
Even with it spelled out in your own quote, you can't admit the mistake
This is not good faith and I have no interest in arguing with your most recent use of a search engine
If you had no web browser you wouldn't be able to write a word about this
You haven't read the articles about the lawsuit, much less the lawsuit itself
No understanding is coming for you, because you'll just argue with it then ask for more until someone gives up, so that you can feel like you were right all along
The quotation literally verbatim agrees with what I said about your error, word for word, and you're still pushing
- PaulDavisThe1st 5y agoI asked you for a single reference to the lawsuit you're referring to. It seems that's too much for you. My quote from the ABQ Journal said "upheld a landmark water rights settlement with the Navajo Nation". You said "Sir, the settlement is what was overturned". Then you avoid explaining this by claiming bad faith. Having now read a good chunk of your comment history on HN, I think it's time to bow out of any attempt to discuss this with you. A persistent failure to provide citations, frequent bad-faith style of discussion, hand-waving assertion-from-self-invented authority seem common. That said, if there actually is a lawuit by the Navajo Nation that overturns the settlement reached with NM, I would actually like to know more about it.