It just feels like yet another murky chain of property ownership. How can these shops possibly sell enough candy to its target market of kids to pay the rent,

It just feels like yet another murky chain of property ownership. How can these shops possibly sell enough candy to its target market of kids to pay the rent, when there are no kids on Oxford St.? Something from 'under the counter' instead? Or just a case of the "landlord" filling it until someone better comes along because Westminster City Council absolutely have to make Oxford St. look like it's busy and bustling as it's allegedly the UK's most popular shopping street? It would lose it's reputation if it looked like any other UK high street, that is to say, full of closed shops and nail bars. To be honest, it wasn't much different in the 80s and 90s. More major shops, but still lots of weird ones that had no right to exist on Oxford St. but were there nonetheless. In 2022, it's far more obvious.