2 ms·
As a UW grad myself, I find myself wishing u/version_five would have posted a top-level comment providing the context of why they feel this is an interesting th
by cldellow 4y ago
As a UW grad myself, I find myself wishing u/version_five would have posted a top-level comment providing the context of why they feel this is an interesting thing to share to HN. I suspect that might have helped set the tone for a more useful discussion.
Three people elsewhere in this thread have commented:
(1) wondering if "there is a website that tracks these things"
(2) asking whether or not this contravenes the Candian Human Rights Act
(3) wondering why Waterloo is being singled out
I don't know much about these topics. Handily, though, the job posting itself seems to address the spirit of these questions by:
(1) citing multiple studies over a period of several years showing that women are under-represented in full-time faculty positions generally and Canada Research Chairs specifically
(2) citing the Ontario Human Rights Commission which permits government programs (for example, the Canada Research Chair program), to be discriminatory if they attempt to ameliorate or remediate discrimination elsewhere
(3) citing UW's 2020-2025 strategic plan that identifies UW in particular as under-representing women on faculty.
For additional context, UW's IAP [1] system shows that as of 2019, Waterloo ranked at the very bottom of the U15 Group of Canadian Research Universities for percentage of full-time, regular, faculty members who identify as female. I don't know how the Faculty of Environment compares to the broader university.
I can understand people not liking affirmative action. But... the questions that were posed thus far in the comments _were_ actually addressed in the job posting, at least, in spirit.
[1]: https://uwaterloo.ca/institutional-analysis-planning/university-data-and-statistics/faculty-data/faculty-gender https://uwaterloo.ca/institutional-analysis-planning/univers...
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- stale2002 4y ago> providing the context of why they feel this is an interesting thing to share to HN. It is about a job posting, for a science related field, from a top research university with requirements that are unique and not particularly common for such fields. I think that makes its very interesting. I don't think I have ever heard of a university having such qualifications spelled out so explicitly.
- azth 4y agoDo you feel bad about what your alma mater is doing? I do. > Waterloo ranked at the very bottom of the U15 Group of Canadian Research Universities for percentage of full-time, regular, faculty members who identify as female. Please explain why that is a bad thing
- cato_the_elder 4y ago> I can understand people not liking affirmative action. "Affirmative action" is obviously an Orwellian propaganda term. The correct description is quotas for the groups currently favoured by the blob. And I think ridicule is the only thing this deserves: > "I am glad that I managed to write 'The Crucible,'" Arthur Miller wrote, "but looking back I have often wished I'd had the temperament to do an absurd comedy, which is what the situation deserved."