The number of bad and wrong ideas stopped by this format vastly outnumber the few examples you think this format impedes. The proper way to evaluate this syste

The number of bad and wrong ideas stopped by this format vastly outnumber the few examples you think this format impedes. The proper way to evaluate this system is not to cherry pick a few rare examples and claim it as the norm. The correct way is to take all inputs, true and false, and see the outcome. Then you compare this info to other systems that have been tried. And maybe propose new systems, but only after you understand the problems with previous systems that led to the current one so you don't simply repeat past errors.