3 ms·
> I'm not sure he should have been, but he very probably was - but my Dad was risking his life to protect the farmer Why not? It's not your father who should c
by ChuckNorris89 5y ago
> I'm not sure he should have been, but he very probably was - but my Dad was risking his life to protect the farmer
Why not? It's not your father who should compensate the farmer but the government. And if government property causes damages to a citizen's livelihood, then the government should compensate them. At least, in a civilized democracy.
- zabzonk 5y agoAnd that's happens in the UK. Of course, the farmer has to put in a claim, and I mean't that I do not know if he did so. Hence: > but he very probably was
- Sebb767 5y agoI think you're missing a comma: > I'm not sure he should have been To > I'm not sure, he should have been Otherwise it reads like you think he shouldn't have been compensated.