3 ms·
>True but not $5939 per meter nicer, That is the problem I am pointing out, that is totally relative to how much money you have. After a certain point the actu
by whatshisface 5y ago
>True but not $5939 per meter nicer,
That is the problem I am pointing out, that is totally relative to how much money you have. After a certain point the actually nice stuff you can buy runs out and you are left going for slightly nicer looking audio cables.
- joenathanone 5y agoPeople, aren't buying these for their looks, but for the false claims of performance. That's the issue, the lie, not the price.
- whatshisface 5y agoDo we actually know why people are buying them? Has anyone A/B tested the marketing copy on this?
- joenathanone 5y agoIt's obvious why, you don't need an a/b study to tell you the sun is shining, you can just look outside.
- airbreather 5y agoWhat about the other 83 miles of cable between you and the power station, when would the audiophile pay some attention to that as well as the last 3 feet?
- joenathanone 5y agoWow, that's deep! Where is the line drawn?
- airbreather 5y agoAt being stupid enough to spend this sort of money on those cables, instead of spending it on something you might actually have a possible chance of hearing.