4 ms·
I have pushed back against contract clauses. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. The most important outcome is the communication itself. Done well, the d
by ISL 4y ago
I have pushed back against contract clauses. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. The most important outcome is the communication itself. Done well, the discussion builds mutual respect. Both sides want to enter into an agreement that is healthy for them as individuals and, in the best case, for the relationship itself.
An example: I've always looked very skeptically at NDAs. I pushed pretty hard for a sunset clause on one once. The other side pushed back. I ultimately decided to sign, as everything else about the arrangement was very acceptable. Once privy to the information on the other side, I understood their reluctance.
Also, there are some states with reasonable worker IP protections. Those change the foundations of some contracts for the better.
- ssss11 4y agoThis is a good answer. It forces the dialogue about the issues, and you either align or realise the relationship for what it is - one way. It hopefully helps build mutual trust but does also risk the relationship failing if you can’t agree on important things.
- ISL 4y agoOne should always have a BATNA, even if it is an unpleasant one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_alternative_to_a_negotiated_agreement https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_alternative_to_a_negotiat...