4 ms·
True but not $5939 per meter nicer, there are cables just as nice if not better for far less. But most importantly people aren't buying these for their looks bu
by joenathanone 4y ago
True but not $5939 per meter nicer, there are cables just as nice if not better for far less. But most importantly people aren't buying these for their looks but for the false performance claims.
- whatshisface 4y ago>True but not $5939 per meter nicer, That is the problem I am pointing out, that is totally relative to how much money you have. After a certain point the actually nice stuff you can buy runs out and you are left going for slightly nicer looking audio cables.
- joenathanone 4y agoPeople, aren't buying these for their looks, but for the false claims of performance. That's the issue, the lie, not the price.
- whatshisface 4y agoDo we actually know why people are buying them? Has anyone A/B tested the marketing copy on this?
- joenathanone 4y agoIt's obvious why, you don't need an a/b study to tell you the sun is shining, you can just look outside.
- airbreather 4y agoWhat about the other 83 miles of cable between you and the power station, when would the audiophile pay some attention to that as well as the last 3 feet?
- joenathanone 4y agoWow, that's deep! Where is the line drawn?
- airbreather 4y agoAt being stupid enough to spend this sort of money on those cables, instead of spending it on something you might actually have a possible chance of hearing.