4 ms·
Honestly, that kind of makes sense. Riding horses is a bit of a masculine thing. I wonder if there's a 'tiny bit' to that. That said, I wonder if most men ever
by jollybean 5y ago
Honestly, that kind of makes sense. Riding horses is a bit of a masculine thing. I wonder if there's a 'tiny bit' to that. That said, I wonder if most men ever even really rode horses very often.
- op00to 5y agoNo, horses were incredibly expensive historically speaking. They need land, food, care, all of which were real expenses.
- DeathArrow 5y agoIn my country rural areas only poor had horses. The rest had cars and agricultural tractors.