Yeah, consensus changes. Especially when new evidence and new ideas arise. That shows that scientific consensus is working. If the scientific consensus threate

Yeah, consensus changes. Especially when new evidence and new ideas arise. That shows that scientific consensus is working. If the scientific consensus threatens assets and income of powerful industries they run massive lobbying and ad campaigns against it and try to interfere with the scientific process itself by funding biased studies. Pretending like the people that exaggerate the effect of climate change are a comparable issue is dishonest and not backed by facts. Classic false symmetry fallacy. Also, the scientific consensus is conditional: If we emit like this, then that will happen. The IPCC report doesn't predict a certain amount of warming.