4 ms·
Yes, between most guitar strings is a perfect 4th interval (where equal temperament ratio [0] and the integer ratio it approximates [1] are quite close to each
by hunter2_ 5y ago
Yes, between most guitar strings is a perfect 4th interval (where equal temperament ratio [0] and the integer ratio it approximates [1] are quite close to each other) but between the G string and B string is a major 3rd interval (where equal temperament ratio [3] and the integer ratio it approximates [4] are a bit farther from each other).
When using a tuner to tune a guitar, you get the equal temperament normally desired for it's ability to play equally in any key. When tuning by ear, if you are just minimizing the beating you hear (instead of targeting the beating that exists in equal temperament, like good piano technicians are trained to do) you'll end up with integer ratios. Accidentally ending up at the integer ratio of a major third is "farther off" than doing so for a perfect fourth. Typically this manifests as a difficult time tuning the B string though, not the G string, if you go low to high. Solution: tune low to high for the E,A,D,G and tune high to low for the high E,B (doing a perfect octave for the E to E where the equal temperament ratio [4] perfectly matches the integer ratio [5]).
[0] 1.334840:1 or 2^(5/12):1
[1] 1.333333:1 or 4:3
[2] 1.259921:1 or 2^(4/12):1
[3] 1.25:1 or 5:4
[4] 2:1 or 2^(12/12):1
[5] 2:1
- ghostpepper 5y agoDoes this mean there's actually a scientific reason to tune by ear instead of with an electronic tuner? I feel like I naturally do some of these things, like tuning low to high but then (seemingly arbitrarily) tune the high e against the low E.
- hunter2_ 5y agoYes, integer ratios sound better than equal temperament ratios. The downside is that you end up with an instrument that has some integer ratios and some disgusting wolf intervals because it's mathematically impossible to have all integer ratios between every possible interval in every possible key you might decide to play in. That problem is what equal temperament solves for, and is a good reason to use an electronic tuner unless you know your songs will sound better without.
- narag 5y agoWhen tuning by ear, if you are just minimizing the beating you hear... I assume you are talking about fretless instruments. With a guitar you just play a unison using the frets and the thicker string.
- hunter2_ 5y agoNo, my entire comment is about tuning a typical fretted guitar. Playing a unison as you say, and turning the peg until beating completely disappears, yields integer ratios instead of equal temperament ratios. The result of that can sound nicer than equal temperament for some keys/chords but terrible for other keys/chords.
- narag 5y agoUnison means same sound. There's no ratio, unless you mean 1:1.
- hunter2_ 5y agoAh shoot. I screwed up (only in the comment you're questioning, not my earlier comment per se). Of course the frets are positioned according to equal temperament, so when fretting a note for tuning the next string, indeed you end up at equal temperament when getting the beating down to nothing as you play the unison. Rather, I'm talking from a point of view of playing two adjacent open strings. Or harmonics thereof (as some people like to tune with 7th fret harmonics and so forth). If you aren't fretting and you minimize beating down to nothing, then you end up with integer ratios.
- narag 5y agoIIRC harmonics ignore frets. You use the fret to approach the point where it happens, but its exact position is a function of the whole string lenght and it's therefore not equal temperament related. I think you're right about the "beating"... in general this post has been extremely instructive for me. My teachers were piano players. Either they didn't know better (because they didn't need it) or they didn't bother to explain the fine details to me. Even the books I consulted later don't tell the whole story. That's the magic of the Internet :-)
- efortis 5y agoPlease let me know if I'm understanding. This technique is for tuning open strings and listening, back-and-forth, to the perfect fourth (or major third) interval? In contrast to matching the same note on the next string?
- hunter2_ 5y agoYeah, I should have clarified, but at the time of writing, I didn't even realize it (because I'm more of a piano tuner than a guitar tuner so I don't have the luxury of frets that automatically impose equal temperament!) -- yes, this issue occurs when comparing open strings or unfretted harmonics.
- efortis 5y agoThank you. You also made me realize that it's better to tune open strings for avoiding intonation shifts by the pressing force.
- hunter2_ 5y agoThat's actually the crux of the issue: if you fret the note to tune the next string, then you achieve equal temperament at the expense of any inaccuracy that comes from all sorts of things like imperfect action height, imperfect bridge tuners, excessive pressure beyond just contacting the fret, sideways motion, etc. which is all avoided by using open strings instead. But then doing open strings by ear doesn't get you equal temperament, it gets you integer ratios instead. Open strings with an electronic tuner gets you the best of both worlds (assuming you want equal temperament).
- dahart 5y agoI find it easier not to tune either high to low nor low to high, but use lots of cross-string intervals and a variety of chords. Since my tuning fork is a standard A, I start on the A string, and use that to tune both E strings and the D, then B relative to high E and D relative to A. It’s good to tune G using both octaves from the low E and A string. This way you never tune a string more than 2 steps away from the reference, as opposed to tuning E,A,D,G, which gives you a G string 3 steps away from the reference. But recently I discovered the most helpful trick, use a fifth from G down to the A string, and also use a fifth from the D to the low E string. Those last two intervals can be the most surprisingly out of tune intervals when using either ear tuning or an electronic tuner.