> It should be a relatively easy Nobel prize if someone wants it. Whether or not someone wants it is not the big question. The big question is if the theory v

> It should be a relatively easy Nobel prize if someone wants it. Whether or not someone wants it is not the big question. The big question is if the theory verifies. Sadly they are not giving out Nobel prizes for carefully and painstakingly disproving theories proposed in anonymous HN comments. So whoever embarks on such a series of experiments has to judge the probability of the theory being true in their decision making. Besides it sounds like you are proposing a new and unknown chemistry effect. Why wouldn’t you go and try to investigate that proposed effect in a test tube first? Living things are super complicated. If you can find a chemical reaction which goes differently in the presence of non-ionizing radiation that alone could be interesting. (Of course the experiment better show that the difference is not due to simple heating.)