That's a big assumption to make. Over the previous two centuries, there have been ongoing rapid changes to our home, work and other environments, the way we li

That's a big assumption to make. Over the previous two centuries, there have been ongoing rapid changes to our home, work and other environments, the way we live and the products we consume and are exposed to. As a result, the number of confounding factors may mask any deleterious effects of RF at a population level. RF is clearly not acutely harmful at normally experienced levels. But are there lesser morbidities or long-term cancer risks which are directly due to RF, but are currently lost in the noise? We might not have seen it already, but it is worth questioning the basic assumption that it's completely safe, and identifying how, why and when it could cause harm.