3 ms·
This sounds untenable considering Mozilla's main revenue source is Google itself. Mozilla is also to blame for this. They seem to have turned into a corrupt co
by alwayslikethis 5y ago
This sounds untenable considering Mozilla's main revenue source is Google itself.
Mozilla is also to blame for this. They seem to have turned into a corrupt company, promoting censorship [1], laying off development staff [2] while the CEO receiving millions in salary [3].
[1] https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/we-need-more-than-deplatforming/ https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/we-need-more-than-deplat...
[2] https://www.theverge.com/2020/8/11/21363424/mozilla-layoffs-quarter-staff-250-people-new-revenue-focus https://www.theverge.com/2020/8/11/21363424/mozilla-layoffs-...
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchell_Baker https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchell_Baker
- emptysongglass 5y agoWhy does the board continue to reward Baker after all these years of plummeting value to the company? That is a question I haven't been able to square.
- egberts1 5y agoIt is called “packing the board”. What is usually done by many elites is now being tried by one against Twitter board of directors.