3 ms·
This article is chock full of cynicism with no actual factual reasoning. Deeply reactionary and without any actual point. A polemic, at best. Need I count the n
by moth-fuzz 4y ago
This article is chock full of cynicism with no actual factual reasoning. Deeply reactionary and without any actual point. A polemic, at best. Need I count the number of references to tumblr, tiktok, social media memes, dyed-hair left-leaning millennials with quirky personalities? All that self-victimization, which is all for the purpose of, let me guess, attention? You're the one writing articles on the internet, my man.
The best evidence this article can come up with is equally polemic articles and a hand-picked troupe of social media teens. Selection bias at its finest.
Is this as tiring for anyone else as it is for me?
Note the top comments saying the same things about homosexuality and transgenderism, of course.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- pksebben 4y agocame here to say it, but you said it better. If the first legitimate-sounding resource mentioned is cherry picked from the early oughts, you might be reading garbage.