>Black holes themselves are, obviously, impossible to image. Unless they produce Hawking radiation. Then by definition they are possible to image. In the origi

>Black holes themselves are, obviously, impossible to image. Unless they produce Hawking radiation. Then by definition they are possible to image. In the original article she mentions that temperature of known black holes is lower than CBR, meaning that they are too cold to be seen agains background of cosmic background radiation. I personally think that they produce no radiation and do not evaporate, but this is just unscientific philosophical opinion.