I think this is a strange take, sure the $34M is in the ethereum account but it is not in someone's bank account, but the people that sent money to that contrac

I think this is a strange take, sure the $34M is in the ethereum account but it is not in someone's bank account, but the people that sent money to that contract do have an NFT right? or have a claim for an NFT that can still be sent to them manually right? I think those NFTs don't have to be worthless, there is just a temporary blip in confidence until the project proves they are still able to perform with less revenue/capital and also still motivated to do so.