I’d say my main concern isn’t strictly “banning books” but open access to information. How do you determine literary value? The catcher in the rye at least was

I’d say my main concern isn’t strictly “banning books” but open access to information. How do you determine literary value? The catcher in the rye at least was considered risqué and had been banned. It isn’t some great novel unlike any other — it’s about a teenager complaining. Even still why ban it? Let people read.