4 ms·
As that article mentions, data quality was abysmal. I once saw a remark about the error bars being larger than the supposed effect - though o cannot find it and
by Beldin 4y ago
As that article mentions, data quality was abysmal. I once saw a remark about the error bars being larger than the supposed effect - though o cannot find it and think that might be overly harsh.
The 1922 test of starlight deflection by the Sun was much, much more accurate. And it did take about 100 years to detect gravitational waves. Though the earliest test was probably the perihelion of Mercury, which I think was covered in the original GR paper.
- hotpotamus 4y agoThat seems to be the way of cutting edge science. The data that Hubble gathered that showed the expansion of the universe is considered terrible by today's standards, but it was enough to prove it.