3 ms·
Gramsci is talking about indifference, not a particular political position. Are you suggesting arguing against indifference is "radical"? Aren't you in your c
by eevilspock 4y ago
Gramsci is talking about indifference, not a particular political position.
Are you suggesting arguing against indifference is "radical"?
Aren't you in your characterization labeling someone the Enemy?
- batch12 4y agoI am saying that the argument that a side must be selected is misused to apply to everything. This has devolved into a checklist of ideas that must be actively endorsed. > Aren't you in your characterization labeling someone the Enemy? Those who promote this ideology are enemies of us all. Edit: The discussion of politics is now the parroting of endorsed talking points. There is no unique or independent thought and it isn't interesting.