3 ms·

Depp was found by a UK court to have assaulted Heard, on a dozen occasions and put her in “fear for her life” three times [1]. So for me it seems clear that the

Depp was found by a UK court to have assaulted Heard, on a dozen occasions and put her in “fear for her life” three times [1]. So for me it seems clear that they are both abusive and not worthy of anyone's time. But my point was that the Depp/Heard issue has very much crossed the line into being completely irrational and morphed into a generalised anti-women sentiment. And it's very much radicalising the younger men in particular on Reddit in ways you don't see on other social media platforms. [1] https://www.theguardian.com/film/2021/mar/25/johnny-depp-loses-bid-to-overturn-ruling-in-libel-case https://www.theguardian.com/film/2021/mar/25/johnny-depp-los...

zmgsabst 5y ago
I think you should investigate deeper. I think the reason you’re not understanding is because you don’t understand the facts that are driving their behavior — behavior which makes sense when you view this trial as “not even Johnny Depp can get justice when a woman lies about him”. I find it genuinely interesting that you assume a group is irrational rather than consider you’ve been misinformed. There are many flaws in the UK case, involving the judge discounting the evidence of third parties while taking at face value the claims of Ms Heard. I would suggest watching the feed or summaries of the Virginia case, with Rekeita Law and Legal Bytes being two prominent channels covering the trial — both featuring panels of attorneys commenting on the case. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbkjX3E0IhuUfPzL0FjSPaw https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbkjX3E0IhuUfPzL0FjSPaw https://www.youtube.com/c/LegalBytesMedia https://www.youtube.com/c/LegalBytesMedia I would recommend this Legal Bytes video for a primer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMKmcRF38FU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMKmcRF38FU
- threeseed 5y ago
  I am not interested in the opinions of random people who aren't privy to the evidence. A judge has found Heard's allegations to be credible. And the onus is on Depp to file an appeal and seek higher courts if he disagrees with this.

zmgsabst 5y ago

I think you should investigate deeper. I think the reason you’re not understanding is because you don’t understand the facts that are driving their behavior — behavior which makes sense when you view this trial as “not even Johnny Depp can get justice when a woman lies about him”. I find it genuinely interesting that you assume a group is irrational rather than consider you’ve been misinformed. There are many flaws in the UK case, involving the judge discounting the evidence of third parties while taking at face value the claims of Ms Heard. I would suggest watching the feed or summaries of the Virginia case, with Rekeita Law and Legal Bytes being two prominent channels covering the trial — both featuring panels of attorneys commenting on the case. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbkjX3E0IhuUfPzL0FjSPaw https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbkjX3E0IhuUfPzL0FjSPaw https://www.youtube.com/c/LegalBytesMedia https://www.youtube.com/c/LegalBytesMedia I would recommend this Legal Bytes video for a primer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMKmcRF38FU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMKmcRF38FU

threeseed 5y ago
I am not interested in the opinions of random people who aren't privy to the evidence. A judge has found Heard's allegations to be credible. And the onus is on Depp to file an appeal and seek higher courts if he disagrees with this.