4 ms·
worries about ADE is clearly widespread in scientific community, and the inversion of infection rates, with vaccinated people catching it more than non-vax, has
by bsaul 5y ago
worries about ADE is clearly widespread in scientific community, and the inversion of infection rates, with vaccinated people catching it more than non-vax, has occured everywhere with the most recent variants.
Of course, any scientist name i'll give as a reference will be immediately categorized as "anti-vax" or "fringe and non representative"... Which curiously is still a grave thing, eventhough a lot of the consensus around covid vaccines has been proved incorrect times and times again (with the only remaining truth being that it does protect people at risk from lethal outcome, which is clearly the bare minimum and not the original expected outcome).
- renaudg 5y ago>any scientist name i'll give as a reference will be immediately categorized as "anti-vax" or "fringe and non representative" That's because they probably are fringe and non representative. And for every Galileo there are 100.000 Dr Wakefield's > a lot of the consensus around covid vaccines has been proved incorrect times and times again If that were true it wouldn't be the consensus, by definition.