> They're very different weapons; an NLAW is unlikely to incapacitate a tank at any range SAAB claims that the NLAW "(...) can destroy a heavily protected mode

> They're very different weapons; an NLAW is unlikely to incapacitate a tank at any range SAAB claims that the NLAW "(...) can destroy a heavily protected modern battle tank with one shot, and the system is effective at ranges between 20 and 800 metres.) https://www.saab.com/newsroom/stories/2018/june/5-facts-about-saabs-nlaw-anti-tank-system https://www.saab.com/newsroom/stories/2018/june/5-facts-abou... Do you have any source that substantiates your personal assertion? > The NLAW can be very useful against structures or softer targets like APCs and IFVs. Wikipedia's article on Russia's battalion tactical group mentions that each is comprised of 10 tanks and 40 IFVs. Even if we take your personal assertion at face value, and given that disabling a IFV also takes infantry out of the picture, it seems the NLAW showcases an impressive bang for the buck.