4 ms·
How many people have these people killed and how many wars have they started in the name of inclusivity?
by donkeybeer 5y ago
How many people have these people killed and how many wars have they started in the name of inclusivity?
- season2episode3 5y agoIt's hard to tell tone from text, but I'm going to assume you're not being facetious here... I'm pretty sure the answer is 0.
- rmbyrro 5y agoThey wage numerous wars, but the playing field is not full of swords and shields, but reputation destruction, intimidation, doxing, canceling, etc. The digital and public life is so important for many people today that, if you eliminate them there, it's like killing a good chunk of their lives. These people wage crusades against individual reputations and public/digital lives. Just because they think differently.
- shadowgovt 5y agoSo like killing except for all the "not killing." So not like killing at all. It is, however, a bit like building an orthodoxy. Which the group formerly in position to build orthodoxy is surprised to learn is an uncomfortable process.
- rmbyrro 5y agoMy reading is the only thing preventing a considerable portion of them from killing is law enforcement, and the fact that most societies has evolved past supporting violence. You have to observe that deadly violence was normalized in the past. It was even entertainment in Rome. Hence, the Colloseum. Externally, it's evolved, but internally the ideolog is quite similar. Some of the similarities are: - divides men and women - interferes and intends to control families - demonizes people that are useful to society and accumulate wealth
- tsol 5y agoWell.. tbh some feminists supported the Afghanistan war based on "feminist grounds". Of course in reality the situation was only made much worse for women. No side is free of making bad choices