4 ms·
How and why is that possibly better than saying "the Japanese attacked them at Pearl Harbor"? The passive voice is what enables the omission of the actor.
by alanh 4y ago
How and why is that possibly better than saying "the Japanese attacked them at Pearl Harbor"? The passive voice is what enables the omission of the actor.
- CameronNemo 4y agoCould also just say "the attack on". Then you don't shift focus or use the passive voice.