3 ms·
https://www.forbes.com/sites/sebastienroblin/2022/03/31/analysis-when-tank-busting-goes-wrong/?sh=74d451aa2228 https://www.forbes.com/sites/sebastienroblin/2022
by AussieWog93 5y ago
https://www.forbes.com/sites/sebastienroblin/2022/03/31/analysis-when-tank-busting-goes-wrong/?sh=74d451aa2228 https://www.forbes.com/sites/sebastienroblin/2022/03/31/anal...
The only thing I've seen about the NLAW is a direct hit on the top turret of a Russian tank doing absolutely nothing.
- pcbro141 5y ago> The NLAW may have a maximum range of 600 or even 800 meters, but it also has a minimum range of 20 meters. Below that range its fuse isn’t meant to go off. > So most likely, the lucky tank was actually too close for the NLAW to work as intended.
- abandonliberty 5y agoThe NLAW has a single warhead, while the Javelin and Stugna have a tandem warhead designed to deactivate ERA first. Who knows how it works in practice. NLAW - 40k Javelin - 80k missile + 140k launcher Stugna - 20k missile
- thunderbird120 5y agoNLAW direct attack mode is intended for soft targets. Its shaped charge warhead points down at a 90 degree angle from the direction of flight. It is intended to detonate while the missile flies over the top of the tank shooting a jet hypersonic molten metal down into the most lightly armored part of the tank. If you use the direct attack mode against a tank it's probably not going to work much better than just throwing an equivalent amount of high explosive at the tank which usually won't do shit.
- ALittleLight 5y agoI hope users know that mode as "Unarmored target mode". Knowing nothing about this I can imagine non-professional soldiers selecting "direct attack" because that sounds intuitively like a thing that would work against a tank.
- robonerd 5y agoI'd like to think each missile comes with an instruction booklet illustrated in the same style as the pamphlets airlines have for evacuations.