4 ms·
Here's what the first page of the bill says[1]: > An act relating to parental rights in education requiring district school boards to adopt procedures that com
by heavyset_go 5y ago
Here's what the first page of the bill says[1]:
> An act relating to parental rights in education requiring district school boards to adopt procedures that comport with certain provisions of law... prohibiting classroom discussion about sexual orientation or gender identity in certain grade levels or in a specified manner;
It very explicitly states that the bill prohibits classroom discussion about sexual orientation or gender identity in certain grade levels.
There are plenty of parents, politicians and government employees who think that acknowledging that LGBT people exist, and should be respected as people, is not age appropriate. There are parents that are convinced that acknowledging their kids' trans peers' existence will convince them to be trans, too, and that "Timmy has two mommies" isn't age appropriate, either.
I've also heard supporters of the legislation claim that it's meant to prevent kids from being taught about sex, despite it already being illegal in Florida to teach kids in that age group about it.
Inspired by Florida's bill, HB 800 was introduced in Tennessee, which is very explicit about prohibiting educators from using any materials or lessons that normalize, address or support LGBT issues and lifestyles[2]:
> The state board is prohibited from approving for local adoption or granting a waiver for, and LEAs and public charter schools are prohibited from locally adopting or using in the public schools of this state, textbooks and instructional materials or supplemental instructional materials that promote, normalize, support, or address lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, or transgender (LGBT) issues or lifestyles.
Nearly a dozen states have proposed similar legislation that aren't afraid of saying the quiet part out loud.
[1] https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2022/1557/BillText/er/PDF https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2022/1557/BillText/er/...
[2] https://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/Default.aspx?BillNumber=HB0800 https://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/Default.aspx?BillN...
- molbioguy 5y agoThat's the preamble to the bill, not the the articles of the bill.
- heavyset_go 5y agoSpirit of the law is just as important as the letter of the law, and court decisions, including Supreme Court decisions, have been reached via the spirit of the law versus laws' exact wording. Those who wrote this bill and voted for it were explicit about how they interpret the bill.
- molbioguy 5y agoWith all due respect, if you read the parent comment and then read the actual bill, it's very hard to reconcile those comments with the actual text of the bill. It's obviously OK to disagree with the bill, but creating strawman arguments is arguably inflamatory and isn't the best way to go about it.
- olliej 5y agoAre you saying, honestly, that you do not believe that the legislator that supported this, or the preamble stating the goal of the legislation, is not an attempt to suppress any acknowledgement of the existence of lgbtq people? Do you honestly believe that this legislation prohibits the discussion of straight relationships?
- juanani 5y ago