4 ms·
But a language relying so heavily on IDE means that the language is severely lacking. People not using said "modern" IDEs are just stuck out of using the langu
by nine_zeros 5y ago
But a language relying so heavily on IDE means that the language is severely lacking.
People not using said "modern" IDEs are just stuck out of using the language. Is this progress?
Even with modern IDEs, there is a difference between what different IDEs do. So now the language is stuck with different IDEs doing different things. Is the progress?
It also means that anyone developing a future IDE can no longer support these languages without support. Is this progress?
God forbid someone tries python on a new architecture where new the entire complex toolchain is not going to be available. They just can't use this language. Is this progress?
- kortex 5y agoI'm pretty sure the IDE uses either mypy or pyrite under the hood. I don't know how this is a sign of python lacking. Works just fine in jupyter notebooks, too, and that is hardly an "IDE" (though it does have Jedi autocomplete).
- nine_zeros 5y ago> I don't know how this is a sign of python lacking If a language cannot be written or used effectively by devs without IDE, it is an incomplete language. This has happened in the past is Java. Within a few years, Python will bloat up like Java and everyone will move on to greener pastures.