3 ms·

It shows the duplicity and double standards When the west starts point fingers at India for - free speech, human rights, co2 emissions or for that matter oil i

It shows the duplicity and double standards When the west starts point fingers at India for - free speech, human rights, co2 emissions or for that matter oil imports from Russia. There is still a colonial mindset at the institutional level where they believe they can just pass arbitrary unfounded judgments and the world has no choice but to accept it. But clearly the data exposes their duplicity.

JumpCrisscross 4y ago
> or for that matter oil imports from Russia India has been given a free pass on its oil and materiel imports from Russia. It's something China complains about quite a bit.
- naruvimama 4y ago
  But US and Europe has increased it's purchase by 8 and 15 percent respectively
  - JumpCrisscross 4y ago
    > US and Europe has increased it's purchase by 8 and 15 percent respectively The U.S. has increased its purchase of Russian oil? That’s odd given we banned it…
    - naruvimama 4y ago
      https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202204/1257500.shtml https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202204/1257500.shtml
      - JumpCrisscross 4y ago
        Oh my. Chinese source citing a “Russian Security Council Deputy Secretary” who “told Russian media” a thing. Incompetent trolls might press your claim better. (For bystanders, the claim is crap [1].) [1] https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/9/us-bans-russian-oil-what-does-this-mean-for-oil-prices https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/9/us-bans-russian-oil-...
      - whatevertrevor 4y ago
        > The Global Times (simplified Chinese: 环球时报; traditional Chinese: 環球時報; pinyin: Huánqiú Shíbào) is a daily tabloid newspaper under the auspices of the Chinese Communist Party's flagship newspaper, the People's Daily, commenting on international issues from a nationalistic perspective.[1][2][3][4] The publication has been labelled as "China's Fox News" by some scholars and writers for its propagandistic slant and the monetization of nationalism. When the Wikipedia entry for your source starts with that, you might want to check the credibility of it before treating it as gospel.
notahacker 4y ago
The Guardian points fingers at the West on the issues of free speech, human rights, CO2 emissions and oil imports from Russia (and pretty much every other oil exporting nation) on a daily basis. The idea that it reserves its criticism for places like India is comically ignorant of the Guardian's editorial stance... (And the prevailing institutional bias at the highest level of government is the other way: it's "we'd probably make more of a fuss about these incidents and allegations if Modi didn't seem such a pro-business, pro-West kinda guy". The UK government's latest obsession is a trade deal with India, after all) Your own arbitrary unfounded judgements of other countries are all over this thread. Sorry, your culture isn't the only one that gets to have an opinion on others.
FerociousTimes 4y ago
Or the more logical explanation is that you're maybe a bit oversensitive to criticism just like the Indian government which proves the point made by The Guardian in exposing these abuses and holding people in power accountable for their policies.

JumpCrisscross 4y ago

> or for that matter oil imports from Russia India has been given a free pass on its oil and materiel imports from Russia. It's something China complains about quite a bit.

naruvimama 4y ago
But US and Europe has increased it's purchase by 8 and 15 percent respectively
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago
  > US and Europe has increased it's purchase by 8 and 15 percent respectively The U.S. has increased its purchase of Russian oil? That’s odd given we banned it…
  - naruvimama 4y ago
    https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202204/1257500.shtml https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202204/1257500.shtml
    - JumpCrisscross 4y ago
      Oh my. Chinese source citing a “Russian Security Council Deputy Secretary” who “told Russian media” a thing. Incompetent trolls might press your claim better. (For bystanders, the claim is crap [1].) [1] https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/9/us-bans-russian-oil-what-does-this-mean-for-oil-prices https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/9/us-bans-russian-oil-...
    - whatevertrevor 4y ago
      > The Global Times (simplified Chinese: 环球时报; traditional Chinese: 環球時報; pinyin: Huánqiú Shíbào) is a daily tabloid newspaper under the auspices of the Chinese Communist Party's flagship newspaper, the People's Daily, commenting on international issues from a nationalistic perspective.[1][2][3][4] The publication has been labelled as "China's Fox News" by some scholars and writers for its propagandistic slant and the monetization of nationalism. When the Wikipedia entry for your source starts with that, you might want to check the credibility of it before treating it as gospel.

notahacker 4y ago

The Guardian points fingers at the West on the issues of free speech, human rights, CO2 emissions and oil imports from Russia (and pretty much every other oil exporting nation) on a daily basis. The idea that it reserves its criticism for places like India is comically ignorant of the Guardian's editorial stance... (And the prevailing institutional bias at the highest level of government is the other way: it's "we'd probably make more of a fuss about these incidents and allegations if Modi didn't seem such a pro-business, pro-West kinda guy". The UK government's latest obsession is a trade deal with India, after all) Your own arbitrary unfounded judgements of other countries are all over this thread. Sorry, your culture isn't the only one that gets to have an opinion on others.

FerociousTimes 4y ago

Or the more logical explanation is that you're maybe a bit oversensitive to criticism just like the Indian government which proves the point made by The Guardian in exposing these abuses and holding people in power accountable for their policies.