3 ms·
No, the phrase "there's no evidence" implies an attempt to find out that resulted in no support for the notion.
by tantalor 5y ago
No, the phrase "there's no evidence" implies an attempt to find out that resulted in no support for the notion.
- thewakalix 5y agoThere are two kinds of “no evidence”! https://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/08/doctor-there-ar.html https://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/08/doctor-there-ar.html
- CodeWriter23 5y agoIf that were the case, they surely would have cited the studies. But let do some simple math. Let's say I (and a dozen other donors) have 10ng/mL of PFAS in my system and a recipient has 5ng/mL. Assuming 20 pints of blood in a human for the rest of this word problem. Recipient requires a transfusion of 10 pints which happen to be sourced by those 12 donors, What is their PFAS load after the transfusion? ˥ɯ/ƃuϛ˙ㄥ :ɹǝʍsu∀