4 ms·
Exactly equal down to the single individual, yes that would be unlikely. Broadly the same, seems perfectly logical to me.
by spzb 4y ago
Exactly equal down to the single individual, yes that would be unlikely. Broadly the same, seems perfectly logical to me.
- rajin444 4y agoMen and women share fundamentally different genetic configurations which makes it seem illogical to me. What makes it seem logical to you?
- spzb 4y agoIntelligence is not purely genetic.
- rajin444 4y agoDon't our genes dictate how we interact with the environment? I'm not sure how it could be anything but. That being said, yes, we can change our environment and see changes in measured intelligence. A person with a head is smarter than one without. To tie it back to your original point, you're saying the male/female differences in intelligence are purely environmental? As in, if two people with different genetic make ups were brought up in the same environment they'd have the same outcomes? If we're seeing equality it's likely the result of changing our environment to force this.
- spzb 4y agoNot really. Not the degree you seem to think. Otherwise identical twins would have the same personality. You’ve edited your post while I wrote this response. Your final point is a straw man. I didn’t say anything like that. Good day to you
- dragonwriter 4y agoIdentical twins aren't exposed to identical environments; if the programmed response was particularly sensitive to small input variations, genes could completely determine interaction with the environment and identical twins could still be very different.
- rajin444 4y ago> Not really. Not the degree you seem to think Can you explain to me how our genetics don't dictate our responses? Short of God or some other unknown unknown (which is certainly possible), I don't see how it could be anything else. Identical twins aren't in identical environments. It's not possible. Sorry for the edits, I was trying to shortcut the argument based on what I thought you were saying.
- nomel 4y ago"Broadly the same" and averages don't work well when you're talking about a very specific sub population that would, necessarily, be picked from the few at the top end of the intelligence distribution.
- spzb 4y agoWe’re talking about men and women. Approximately 50% each of humankind. Hardly “very specific sub populations”
- nomel 4y agoNo, please see the context/comment chain that this comment exists in. We're talking about hiring in tech. The average person doesn't apply to, get hired for, or succeed in, tech positions. Most tech positions require a higher degree because most tech (programming, computer science, hardware engineering, etc) requires or directly benefits from that higher degree. Those that hold those higher degrees have an above average intelligence. Those with the highest intelligence usually having the most success in the technical part of the tech workforce. Tech prefers the higher side of the intelligence distribution, because it's hard.