4 ms·
I'm glad the author (you?) was successful and managed to monetize NN512. I seemed to remember reading some rant about it but it seems I was mistaken, sorry. I
by touisteur 5y ago
I'm glad the author (you?) was successful and managed to monetize NN512. I seemed to remember reading some rant about it but it seems I was mistaken, sorry.
I didn't mean to be disparaging and I guess that's my fault asking questions or stating doubts on HN but last time I tried, with some not off the shelf models, to use it wasn't 'just' loading structs. There were some ops missing and not every one uses mainstream convnets. I guess I was wrong too and couldn't make some lstms work right aways.
As for the comments on 'competent', not caring to read, asking if I know my networks (as I talked about using other inference libraries that I seem to be able to make work), etc. I think that was uncalled for, but since I seem to annoy you, I promise not chip in on NN512 anymore. Thanks.
- 37ef_ced3 5y agoI didn't mean to insult you. My apologies. All I meant was: it's not hard to write your weights to a file as floats and fread() them into a struct. I view this as the simplest possible universal interface. And you're right: NN-512 supports only the classical ConvNet operations. It does that one thing, and it does it well. If you need LSTMs or transformers, or training, etc., another tool is needed. Have a nice day.