3 ms·
I am a bit torn on the idea that artifacts shouldn't be moved unless by an archeologist. An archeologist can learn a lot about a culture from artifacts in plac
by tastyfreeze 5y ago
I am a bit torn on the idea that artifacts shouldn't be moved unless by an archeologist. An archeologist can learn a lot about a culture from artifacts in place in the strata but not nearly as much from moved artifacts. However, in the US anything older than 50 years is protected by law as "historical" which I find ridiculous. Legally I am not permitted to pick up a 1970s soda can found in the woods because it is historical trash.
I am of the mind that if I find something cool on the ground I am going to take it. If I don't somebody else will. All of the archeological sites we have today are what is left after millennia of people taking what they found. Life is too short to follow all the rules.
- AlotOfReading 5y agoYou're misinterpreting the 50-year rule. Any site or collection of artifacts older than 50 years is eligible to be considered for inclusion in the historical site register when documented because it meets one criterion. The other criteria are things like historical/cultural significance. Please free to clean up all the 20th century trash you find. We have lots of it. Archaeologists don't like documenting pepsi cans either and long-winded arguments on this subject can be found in many journals.