Yeah, the article mentions recipients of the toxic blood. I wonder if there will be more research to identify any risks for recipients > The logic in removing

Yeah, the article mentions recipients of the toxic blood. I wonder if there will be more research to identify any risks for recipients > The logic in removing them is simple: PFAS work by binding to serum proteins in the blood; removing some of this blood, therefore, would lead to the reduction of forever chemicals in the bloodstream. As to the question of what happens to recipients of this blood: “Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances are ubiquitous, and no threshold has been identified that poses an increased risk to recipients of donated blood components.”