4 ms·
But... you don't own the copyright to the movie. The studio does. You were paid a wage for a job. You can accuse the pirates of limiting your potential for fut
by dml2135 5y ago
But... you don't own the copyright to the movie. The studio does. You were paid a wage for a job.
You can accuse the pirates of limiting your potential for future earnings, but that is not the same as stealing from you.
- Stunting 5y agomy contract is directly related to the post box office profits of the movie.
- dml2135 5y agoFair enough, but still, depriving you of potential earnings is not the same as stealing. If I can't buy something for a price that's worth it to me, I will just watch something else. It doesn't mean I'm going to pay more for it. You get the same amount of money either way.
- brewdad 5y agoIf you choose not to pay for their movie and watch something else, you are correct that you didn't steal from them. You did steal from someone else just like them though. If you pirate their movie, then yes you did in fact steal income from them. The act of choosing to pirate that particular movie changes it from a matter of potential income to a loss of actual income.
- Stunting 5y agoRight, so that isn't stealing. It is in fact what I advocate strongly. If more people did that, more content they would enjoy would be provided at a reasonable cost. But extracting the value of watching something without paying the fee for that service...that's stealing.
- wtetzner 5y agoNot to argue either way about piracy, but it sounds like you might want to work on getting a better contract.
- Stunting 5y agoha. You are not wrong. The winds are shifting and I'm optimistic that i will be able to individually garner a better contract over time even if my union fails to help with it.