3 ms·
Or, it really was that bad and flopped so hard out of the gate that it was better to cut the losses.
by Overtonwindow 5y ago
Or, it really was that bad and flopped so hard out of the gate that it was better to cut the losses.
- a4isms 5y agoI was speaking to why they rushed the launch. CNN+ being intrinsically bad as a service and/or a terrible fit for their built-in market can also be true, and the two reinforce each other: This is 100% unadulterated speculation on my part, but if the executives still in charge of CNN+ thought it had problems, they'd be doubly fearful of the axe coming down when the business was reviewed, so they may have been motivated to get it launched whether they were ready to launch or not. If they had no fear of a business review and possible cancellation, they might have decided to delay the launch and try to fix the content/market problems.