3 ms·
> That thought would be interesting enough to chew over, but the researchers have gone one hypothesis further: that the fire was more than mere illumination and
by karaterobot 5y ago
> That thought would be interesting enough to chew over, but the researchers have gone one hypothesis further: that the fire was more than mere illumination and its flickerings acted to provide a primitive animation to the plaquettes’ carvings.
I just checked, and LED lighting wasn't invented until much later than 15,000 years ago. So, whether they benefited from the primitive animation or not, I am confident they would have displayed their art by firelight anyway.
- seoaeu 5y agoOr sunlight...
- karaterobot 5y agoThe plaquettes are small and portable, so they may have done both. But if they're enjoying the animation effect of a fire, it's probably dark.