Your initial statement was that the type system was a poor architectural choice because it doesn't support standard python idioms. To the best of my ability I'v

Your initial statement was that the type system was a poor architectural choice because it doesn't support standard python idioms. To the best of my ability I've tried to communicate that there's an important difference between the type system and the standard library, that one can make it work and that the situation is not worse than most other typed languages. If you think that's violently agreeing and talking down to you, then there must be some communication barrier that I don't know how to overcome.