3 ms·
~~~"...Inside CNN, executives saw the launch as a success. As of Tuesday, CNN+ had roughly 150,000 subscribers...."~~~ ups, sorry. As the sibling states this is
by radiospiel 4y ago
~~~"...Inside CNN, executives saw the launch as a success. As of Tuesday, CNN+ had roughly 150,000 subscribers...."~~~ ups, sorry. As the sibling states this is in the other CNN+ related article
- listenallyall 4y agoSubscriber counts are the #1 most important metric for any streaming service. Did you see what happened to Netflix the other day? Axios buried CNN+ subscriber counts in paragraph 14 of the earlier article and doesn't mention them at all in this one. The entire series is an attempt to blame corporate mergers and lack of executive leadership rather than the fact that CNN has terrible viewership and brand equity. You need to learn to be a more critical news reader.
- rvz 4y agoPrecisely spot on and succinct. Couldn't have put it better myself. You can clearly see what's going on when you read the viewing figures of other media and streaming services out there and figure out why they're starting to shut down and restructure in the first place. Instead with this article, they continue to dodge those metrics and blame it on something else, or even on something totally un-related. It is another form of deflection and denial to try to salvage anything useful to learn from this failure. Expect that there is nothing to learn from this since, it is the sequel to another repeated mainstream media product failure since Quibi and they haven't learned anything since that collective failure even in a global lockdown. It is quite silly to see any defence in any prospect of this service quite frankly.
- gsibble 4y agoWanted to say spot on as well. Great comment.