4 ms·

>but for some odd reason they still decided to build a new school and a bunch of housing there. The worst part about it is that it was then used to champion as

>but for some odd reason they still decided to build a new school and a bunch of housing there. The worst part about it is that it was then used to champion asinine legislation that hurts the people who want to do things right. So now every municipality who wants to buy some old poisoned dump on the cheap (because it's poisoned and that restricts development) and not be idiots with it (e.g. turn it into a park or a parking lot or some other use not involving serious excavation) can't actually buy the land and do so because no sane company will sell it to them because they could just go and do something stupid and then turn around and make the company pay. It's like the municipal equivalent of taking a free boat off someone's lawn in order to get an engine core and then acting like you got swindled when you find out it costs money or labor to get rid of a boat and then having the state pass a law making boat owners liable for disposal in perpetuity.

mrguyorama 5y ago
What a shame that companies are forced to pay for the poisons they produced while making profits off those same poisons. Privatize the gains, socialize the losses of course.
- throwaway0a5e 5y ago
  FFS are you serious? These companies were following the law as it was written when they were doing these things. How would you like it if you renovated a kitchen or added a deck and then 30yr later got sued because it wasn't adherent to the future code you didn't even know would exist? You just can't run a society with retroactive liability like that.
lakhim 5y ago
My friend, the right thing to do is not half ass dispose of extremely toxic chemicals in a relatively populated area. It's the municipal equivalent of burying a land mine in your back yard, and putting a note in your deed that its there.
- throwaway0a5e 5y ago
  These areas mostly weren't that populated when these things were being disposed of and these companies were doing the "right thing" by the laws and common standards of the time.

mrguyorama 5y ago

What a shame that companies are forced to pay for the poisons they produced while making profits off those same poisons. Privatize the gains, socialize the losses of course.

throwaway0a5e 5y ago
FFS are you serious? These companies were following the law as it was written when they were doing these things. How would you like it if you renovated a kitchen or added a deck and then 30yr later got sued because it wasn't adherent to the future code you didn't even know would exist? You just can't run a society with retroactive liability like that.

lakhim 5y ago

My friend, the right thing to do is not half ass dispose of extremely toxic chemicals in a relatively populated area. It's the municipal equivalent of burying a land mine in your back yard, and putting a note in your deed that its there.

throwaway0a5e 5y ago
These areas mostly weren't that populated when these things were being disposed of and these companies were doing the "right thing" by the laws and common standards of the time.