These are their four studies: https://i.imgur.com/nKRjmRb.png https://i.imgur.com/nKRjmRb.png https://i.imgur.com/ExmNV0A.png https://i.imgur.com/ExmNV0A.png ht

These are their four studies: https://i.imgur.com/nKRjmRb.png https://i.imgur.com/nKRjmRb.png https://i.imgur.com/ExmNV0A.png https://i.imgur.com/ExmNV0A.png https://i.imgur.com/3k4ILIt.png https://i.imgur.com/3k4ILIt.png https://i.imgur.com/CX45O9Y.png https://i.imgur.com/CX45O9Y.png In these discussions about DK I've only seen Study 1 referenced (case in point: "look at the graph"), which is "Participants rated each joke on the same 11-point scale used by the comedians". Sure, there's in aggregate a slight positive slope to self-assessment when plotted against performance. But all of these have in common that the range of self-assessments is small across the full range of performances and they're all centered somewhere around 60. > The actual DK result The "incompetent self-assessment because incompetent" claim is literally everywhere in the paper. It's in the title, the abstract, the introduction and every section thereafter until the end.