2 ms·
A shame. My understanding is this was state of the art, for a free and open source decompiler. Of course, times change and AFAICT Ghidra has taken up that mant
by orra 5y ago
A shame. My understanding is this was state of the art, for a free and open source decompiler.
Of course, times change and AFAICT Ghidra has taken up that mantle.
- taviso 5y agoI'm surprised to hear that, I thought retdec was pretty well regarded.
- orra 5y agoGood point. I don't mean this as a slight against retdec. Simply, retdec was proprietary for quite a while, and it escaped my mind. retdec haven't tagged (or built) a release in a couple years, unfortunately, but there is recent activity on their repo.