Results sections typically do not try to make any inferences about the population at large, only the studied sample. They are also stated in the language of sta

Results sections typically do not try to make any inferences about the population at large, only the studied sample. They are also stated in the language of statistics - because the results failed to statistically uphold the "TRE is more beneficial" hypothesis, the correct interpretation is that the result is "not 'more beneficial'". In other words, the result "does not confirm that TRE is more beneficial for the sample". Although the authors don't make a claim about the population overall in the Result section, they may be more optimistic about future research in the Discussion section of the article - I haven't accessed the full document.